APPENDIX II-BQ: White, et
al, “
This appendix is copied from:
http://www.ajtmh.org/cgi/reprint/75/2/346
Copyright@2006 The American Society of
Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 75(2), 2006,
pp. 346-349.
BRADLEY J. WHITE,
DAVID R. ANDREW, NICOLE Z. MANS, OJIMADU A. OHAJURUKA, AND MARY C. GARVIN*
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre
Dame, Indiana; Department of Biology, Oberlin College,
Oberlin, Ohio; Department of Entomology, University of California,
Davis, California; Vector-Borne Disease Program,
Ohio Department of Health,
Abstract. From June 19, 2003 to August 18, 2003, we surveyed the
mosquitoes of Oberlin, OH, for West Nile Virus
(WNV)
infection using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. A total of 12,055
mosquitoes, representing 17
species or species
groups and 4 genera, were collected in gravid traps at seven sites throughout
the city, with Culex
pipiens/restuans being
the most abundant and showing the highest minimum infection rate (MIR) of 0.78.
This represents
a decrease in WNV
enzootic activity from the previous year. Both Cx. pipiens/restuans
abundance
and MIR increased
significantly with
date. However, we found no correlation between Cx. pipiens/restuans
abundance
and MIR.
INTRODUCTION
West Nile Virus (WNV;
family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus)
was first detected in
Ohio during the summer of 2001 in
a blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata) collected in the
northeast corner
of the state. By the
end of 2001, the virus was detected in
24 Ohio counties, and
by the end of 2002, it could be found in
all 88 counties (Ohio
Department of Health, unpublished
data). A previous
study monitored the WNV activity within
mosquito populations in the
northern Ohio
during the summers of 2001
and 2002.1 Although they reported
no WNV activity in
2001, during the summer of
2002, > 23% of the
mosquito pools tested were WNV positive,
with Culex pipiens/restuans
representing
90% of the positive
pools.
Despite studies of
the WNV cycle in Europe, Asia, Africa,
Australia, and North
America, much remains to be learned
about the ecology of the
virus, especially the conditions that
lead to outbreaks,
which remain fairly unpredictable.2 In light
of this, continued
documentation of WNV activity is critical
for enhancing our
understanding of the cycle in North
America. To better
understand the WNV cycle in northern
Ohio and provide continued
documentation of the rate of
WNV activity during
2003, we monitored mosquito populations
for WNV during the
summer of 2003. The objective of
this study was to
document mosquito species composition and
abundance, as well as
the presence and minimum infection
rate (MIR) of WNV in
mosquitoes during this period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was
conducted at seven sites within the city limits
of Oberlin in Lorain
County, OH, from 19 June 2003 to 18
August 2003.
Mosquitoes were collected using CDC Gravid
Traps (model 1712; J.
W. Hock, Gainesville, FL) baited with
an infusion of water
and grass, which was allowed to ferment
at least 10 days
before trapping. Infusion or water was added
as needed. Holes were
drilled in the sides of the basins, ∼3 in
below the top of the
basin, to prevent rainwater from collecting
and obstructing
mosquito entry into the trap. To prevent
larval emergence, the
traps were treated monthly with Vectolex
(Valent
Biosciences Corp., Libertyville, IL).
Collections were made
at each of seven wooded lots
throughout the city
as shown by Mans and others.1 At each
site, three traps
were placed at least 50 m apart, in spots that
were free of
overgrowth and adequately accessible for collection.
Traps were operated
for three consecutive nights each
week. Each trap was
powered by a 6-V battery, (model PS-
6200; PowerSonic Corp., San Diego, CA) running at 20
Amps/h. Traps were
equipped with LCS-2 PhotoSwitches
(P/N 1.60; J. W.
Hock) programmed to activate traps from
dusk to dawn. Collections
were made the morning after each
three-night trapping
session was complete.
Mosquitoes were
aspirated from gravid traps with batterypowered,
mechanical aspirators
(Hausherr’s Machine Works,
Toms River, NJ),
returned to the laboratory, and placed in a
−20°C freezer
for at least an hour. After freezing, the mosquitoes
were sorted to
species and sex.3 Cx. pipiens and Cx.
restuans were identified as
the species complex Cx. pipiens/
restuans because of difficulty
of differentiating between the
two species by
morphologic characteristics.
Mosquitoes were
placed into pools of 50 or less. Males and
females were
separated, and each trap was treated independently.
After placement into
pools, mosquitoes were stored at
–70°C and shipped to
the Vector-Borne Disease Program of
the Ohio Department
of Health for real-time reverse transcriptase-
polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) testing as previously
described.1 Aedes triseriatus
were
stored for future
studies of LaCrosse encephalitis. MIR was expressed as the
number of pools
infected per 1,000 mosquitoes tested.
To determine if
temperature and rainfall contributed to
increased abundance
of Cx. pipiens/restuans in this study
compared with 2002 as
reported by Mans and others,1 we
conducted an
independent sample t test to compare May–
August mean weekly
temperature and rainfall between the 2
years. Weather data
were collected at the A. J. Lewis Center
at Oberlin College.
We used a Spearman rank correlation
coefficient to test
for the effect of date on the percent of
positive pools, MIR,
and abundance of Cx. pipiens/restuans.
To test for an effect
of trap site on percent positive pools and
Cx. pipiens/restuans
abundance,
we used a _2 contingency
analysis.
RESULTS
During the summer of
2003, we collected 12,055 mosquitoes
representing 17
species or species groups and 4 genera
(Table 1). The Cx. pipiens/restuans
complex
accounted for
* Address
correspondence to Mary C. Garvin, Department of Biology,
Oberlin College, 119
Woodland St., Oberlin, OH 44074. E-mail:
mary.garvin@oberlin.edu
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 75(2), 2006, pp.
346–349
Copyright © 2006 by
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
346
11,761 (97.6%) of the
mosquitoes collected. Of the 575 pools
tested, 10 were WNV
positive. Nine (90%) of the pools were
comprised of female Cx. pipiens/restuans, representing 2.6%
of all female Cx. pipiens/restuans
pools
tested, and one was a
female Anopheles quadrimaculatus. The overall MIR for
Cx.
pipiens/restuans was
0.78 (Table 2).
We found no
significant difference between mean weekly
temperature (t _ 0.608, df _ 34, P _ 0.547) or rainfall (t _
−0.02, df _ 34, P _ 0.984) between 2002 and 2003.
West Nile virus was
first detected in Cx. pipiens/restuans on
June 23. Percent of
positive pools and MIR correlated
positively with date
(r2 _ 0.82, P _ 0.007 and r2 _ 0.64,
P _ 0.044, respectively, Figure 1). All weeks, except the last
two in July, produced
at least one positive pool of Cx. pipiens/
restuans. We also found a
significant effect of date on
abundance of Cx. pipiens/restuans
(r2
_
−0.67,
P _ 0.035,
Figure 2). Cx. pipiens/restuans
abundance
was highest
during the week of 7
July, with 3,338 specimens collected,
and declined
throughout the rest of the summer. The single
An. quadrimaculatus positive pool was
collected on
28 July.
Trap location had no
significant effect on the percentage of
positive pools (_2 _ 3.67, df_ 6, P _ 0.721, Table 2). Every
trap location except
Site 1 had at least one positive pool,
whereas Sites 3, 4,
and 7 produced two positive pools each.
Site 7 had the
highest percentage of positive pools with 4.7%.
MIR at each trap
location ranged from 0 at Site 1 to 2.15 at
Site 5. Sample size
limitations precluded statistical analysis of
these data. We also
did not find a significant association between
site and abundance of
Cx. pipiens/restuans (_2_10.28,
df _ 6, P _ 0.113).
DISCUSSION
Overall, we found
that only 2.6% of Cx. pipiens/restuans
pools tested in 2003
were positive for WNV, a reduction from
the 34% reported at
this site in 2002.1 This reduction is remarkable
given a > 7-fold
increase in the number of Cx. pipiens/
restuans captured and tested.
The increased abundance of
this species group is
likely caused by the increased trapping
effort given that
neither mean weekly temperature nor rainfall
varied between 2002
and 2003. However, similar to the
2002 study, this
species group comprised 90% of the total
WNV-positive pools
and was the most abundant mosquito
collected. This
decreased virus activity reflects trends found
FIGURE 2. Abundance
of Cx. pipiens/restuans collected in gravid
traps from June to
August 2003.
TABLE 1
Summary of mosquitoes
collected, pooled, and assayed for WNV in
Northern Ohio from 19
June to 18 August 2003
Species
No. pools tested
(no. mosquitoes tested)
No. female
positive pools (%)
Total no.
mosquitoes Female
Male
Ae. albopictus
1 (1) 0
(0) 0 1
Ae. cinereus
1 (1) 0
(0) 0 1
Ae. vexans
30 (53)
2 (2) 0 55
An. barberi 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 1
An. punctipennis
9 (9) 12 (14) 0 23
An. quadrimaculatus
13 (16) 8 (21) 1
(7.7%) 37
Cx. pipiens/
restuans 344 (11,591) 61 (170)
9 (2.6%) 11,761
Ae. canadensis
6 (6) 0
(0) 0 6
Ae. grossbecki
3 (3) 0
(0) 0 3
Ae. japonicus
1 (1) 0
(0) 0 1
Ae. sticticus
1 (1) 0
(0) 0 1
Ae. stimulans
5 (10) 0
(0) 0 10
Ae. triseriatus
60 (132)
1 (2) 0 134
Ae. trivittatus
12 (17)
0 (0) 0 17
Ae. spp. 2 (2) 0 (0) 0 2
Ae. spp. 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 1
Ps. ferox 1 (1) 0 (0) 0 1
Total 491 (11,846) 84
(209) 10 (2.04%) 12,055
TABLE 2
West Nile virus
infection rates in female Cx. pipiens/restuans mosquitoes
in Oberlin, Ohio from
19 June to 18 August 2003
Site
No. WNV
positive pools
(total pools tested)
No.
specimens
tested MIR
1 0 (32) 657 0
2 1 (75) 3,327 0.30
3 2 (61) 2,249 0.89
4 2 (54) 1,851 1.08
5 1 (30) 465 2.15
6 1 (51) 1,766 0.57
7 2 (41) 1,276 1.57
Total 9 (344) 11,591
0.78
FIGURE 1. Minimum
infection rate of West Nile virus in Cx. pipiens/
restuans collected in gravid
traps from June to August 2003.
WNV IN NORTHERN OHIO,
2003 347
throughout Ohio in
2003. Between 2002 and 2003, human
cases declined from
430 to 170 and horse cases from 644 to
106. Moreover, the
percentage of positive live birds declined
from 17.4 to 5.5%
during the 2-year period (Ohio Department
of Health,
unpublished data). The endemic European
cycle of WNV seems to
follow a similar pattern, whereby
outbreaks with 10 or
more human cases are usually followed
by few cases in the
next 2 consecutive years despite increased
surveillance.4
Acquired immunity of birds may be the most
reasonable explanation
for the observed decline in WNV activity
in Cx. pipiens/restuans.5 Birds that
survived initial infection
with WNV in the
summer of 2002 may have developed
permanent immunity,
precluding their serving as reservoir
hosts in the summer
of 2003. In addition, because immunocompetence
is a heritable
trait,6 offspring of immune birds
may have developed
resistance to WNV. Furthermore, infection
may have resulted in
increased mortality in the reservoir
host population given
the mortality observed in captive blue
jays and crows.5,7
The combined effect of these factors could
have resulted in a
reduction of the reservoir capacity of avian
populations and,
therefore, less transmission than in the previous
year. Given that
neither temperature nor rainfall varied
significantly between
2002 and 2003, we do not believe that
weather conditions
contributed to the decreased activity observed
in 2003.
Although, because of
the trapping methods used, we were
unable to capture and
test mammalophilic mosquito species
that could serve as
bridge vectors, others have speculated
about the possibility
of members of the Cx. pipiens complex
serving this role
given reports of nonavian feeding in both Cx.
pipiens and Cx. restuans.8–10 Even if only a
small fraction of
the Cx. pipiens
in our
study area take blood meals from mammals,
the role of this
species may be significant in the epizootic
cycle because of its
relative abundance and vector competence.
11 Cx. restuans
is less
likely to be a major epidemic
vector because its early
summer population peak does not
correspond to the
peak activity in the epizootic cycle in the
late summer.12,13
However, given its ornithophilic feeding behavior,
it may have played a
major role in amplification of the
virus early in the
summer.
Abundance of Cx. pipiens/restuans
did not
positively correlate
with MIR. However,
similar to the 2002 study, we
found a positive
correlation between both the percentage of
positive pools and
MIR and date.1 The late summer rise in
WNV activity in 2002
may have been the result of seasonal
increase in abundance
of Cx. pipiens relative to Cx. restuans,
the more efficient of
the two vector species.1,14,15 Environmental
conditions also may
have played a role; ambient temperature
has been shown to
influence the vector competence
of Cx. pipiens
in the
laboratory,16 and rainfall may have influenced
availability of
breeding habitat. In addition, avian
demography may have
played a role in the transmission dynamics
of the late summer.
If many of the adult birds in our
study area had
developed antibody-based immunity to WNV,
but did not transfer
this immunity to offspring, we would
expect relatively
more amplification in birds late in the summer
because of the
abundance of immunonaive juveniles during
that time.17 These factors
should be considered in future
attempts to study WNV
transmission in nature.
Received April 27,
2005. Accepted for publication April 7, 2006.
Acknowledgments: The
authors thank Richard Gary, Robert
Restifo, Steven Chordas (Zoonotic and
Vector-borne Disease Program,
Ohio Department of
Health), Scott Pozna, and Kenneth Pierce
(Lorain County
General Health District) for logistical support of this
project. We also
thank John Petersen (Oberlin College) for access to,
and assistance with,
weather data.
Financial support:
This work was supported by a grant from the
Mellon Foundation to
Oberlin College and the Vector-Borne Disease
Program, Ohio
Department of Health.
Authors’ addresses:
Bradley J. White, Center for Tropical Disease
Research and
Training, University of Notre Dame, 107 Galvin Life
Sciences Building,
Notre Dame, IN 46556. David R. Andrew and
Mary C. Garvin,
Department of Biology, Oberlin College, 117 Woodland
Street, Oberlin, OH
44074. Nicole Z. Mans, Department of Entomology,
University of California
Davis, One Shields Avenue,
Davis, CA 95616. Ojimadu A. Ohajuruka,
Vector-Borne Disease
Program, Ohio
Department of Health, 900 Freeway Dr. N., Columbus,
OH 43229.
Reprint requests:
Mary Garvin, Department of Biology, Oberlin College,
119 Woodland Street,
Oberlin, OH 44074. E-mail: Mary
.Garvin@oberlin.edu.
REFERENCES
1. Mans NZ, Yurgionas SE, Gary R, Bresky JD, Galaitsis AC, Ohajuruka
OA, Garvin MC, 2004.
West Nile virus in mosquitoes of
Northern Ohio
2001–2002. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70: 562–565.
2. Zeller HG, Schuffenecker I, 2004. West Nile virus: An overview
of its spread in
Europe and the Mediterranean Basin in contrast
to its spread in the
Americas. Eur J Clin Microbiol
Infect
Dis 23: 147–156.
3. Restifo R, 1982. Illustrated Key to
the Mosquitoes of Ohio. Ohio
Biological Survey, Biological Notes No. 17. Columbus, OH:
The Ohio State
University.
4. Hubalek Z, 2000. European experience with the West Nile
virus
ecology and
epidemiology: Could it be relevant for the New
World? Viral Immunol 13: 415–426.
5. Komar N, Langevin S, Hinten S, Nemeth N, Edwards E, Hettler
D, Davis B, Bowen R,
Bunning M, 2003. Experimental infection
of North American
birds with the New York 1999 strain of
West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 311–322.
6. Raberg L, Stjernman M, Hasselquist D, 2003. Immune responsiveness
in adult blue tits:
Heritability and effects of nutritional
status during
ontogeny. Ecophysiology 136: 360–364.
7. McClean RG, Ubico SR, Docherty
DE, Hansen WR, Sileo L,
McNamara TS, 2001.
West Nile virus transmission and ecology
in birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci
951: 54–57.
8. Apperson CS, Harrison BA, Unnasch
TR, Hassan HK, Irby WS,
Savage HM, Aspen SE,
Watson DW, Rueda LM, Engber
BR,
Nasci RS, 2002. Host
feeding habits of Culex and
other mosquitoes
(Diptera:
Culicidae) in the Borough of Queens in New
York City, with
characters and techniques for identification of
Culex mosquitoes. J Med Entomol 39: 777–785.
9. Buescher MD, Bickley WE, 1979.
The second blood meal of the
Northern House
Mosquito: bird vs. human blood. Mosq News
39: 93–96.
10. Tempelis CH, 1975. Host-feeding patterns of mosquitoes with
a
review of advances in
analysis of blood meals by serology.
J Med Entomol 11: 635–653.
11. Kilpatrick AM,
Kramer LD, Campbell SR, Alleyne EO, Dobson
AP, Daszak P, 2005. West Nile virus risk assessment and the
bridge vector
paradigm. Emerg Inf Dis 11: 425–429.
12. Joy JE, Hanna AA,
Kennedy BA, 2003. Spatial and temporal
variation in the
mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)
inhabiting
waste tires in
Nicholas County, West Virginia. J Med Entomol
40: 73–77.
13. Lee JH, Rowley
HA, 2000. The abundance and seasonal distribution
of Culex mosquitoes in Iowa
during 1995–1997. J Am
Mosquito Contr 16: 275–278.
14. Nasci RS, White DJ, Stirling H,
Oliver J, Daniels TJ, Falco RC,
Campbell S, Crans WJ, Savage HM, Lanciotti
RS, Moore CG,
Godsey MS, Gottfried KL,
Mitchell CJ, 2001. West Nile virus
WHITE AND OTHERS 348
isolates from
mosquitoes in New York and New Jersey, 1999.
Emerg Infect Dis 7: 626–630.
15. Bernard KA, Maffei JG, Jones SA, Kauffman EB, Ebel
G, Dupuis
APII, Ngo KA,
Nicholas DC, Young DM, Shi PY, Kulasekera
VL, Edison M, White
DJ, Stone WB, Kramer LD,
West Nile Virus
Surveillance Team NY, 2001. West Nile virus
infection in birds
and mosquitoes, New York State, 2000.
Emerg Inf
Dis 7: 679–685.
16. Dohm DJ, O’Guinn ML, Turell MJ, 2002. Effects of environmental
temperature on the
ability of Culex pipiens (Diptera:
Culicidae) to transmit West
Nile virus. J Med Entomol
39:
221–225.
17. Garvin MC, Tarvin KA, Stark LM, Woolfenden
GE, Fitzpatrick
GW, Day JF, 2004. Arboviral infection in two species of wild
jays (Aves: Corvidae): Evidence for population impacts. J Med
Entomol 41: 215–225.
WNV IN NORTHERN OHIO,
2003 349